Randomised controlled trial comparing problem solving treatment with amitriptyline and placebo for major depression in primary care
- 18 February 1995
- Vol. 310 (6977), 441-445
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6977.441
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether, in the treatment of major depression in primary care, a brief psychological treatment (problem solving) was (a) as effective as antidepressant drugs and more effective than placebo; (b) feasible in practice; and (c) acceptable to patients. Design: Randomised controlled trial of problem solving treatment, amitriptyline plus standard clinical management, and drug placebo plus standard clinical management. Each treatment was delivered in six sessions over 12 weeks. Setting: Primary care in Oxfordshire. Subjects: 91 patients in primary care who had major depression. Main outcome measures: Observer and self reported measures of severity of depression, self reported measure of social outcome, and observer measure of psychological symptoms at six and 12 weeks; self reported measure of patient satisfaction at 12 weeks. Numbers of patients recovered at six and 12 weeks. Results: At six and 12 weeks the difference in score on the Hamilton rating scale for depression between problem solving and placebo treatments was significant (5.3 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 9.0) and 4.7 (0.4 to 9.0) respectively), but the difference between problem solving and amitriptyline was not significant (1.8 (−1.8 to 5.5) and 0.9 (−3.3 to 5.2) respectively). At 12 weeks 60% (18/30) of patients given problem solving treatment had recovered on the Hamilton scale compared with 52% (16/31) given amitriptyline and 27% (8/30) given placebo. Patients were satisfied with problem solving treatment; all patients who completed treatment (28/30) rated the treatment as helpful or very helpful. The six sessions of problem solving treatment totalled a mean therapy time of 3 1/2 hours. Conclusions: As a treatment for major depression in primary care, problem solving treatment is effective, feasible, and acceptable to patients. Key messages Patient compliance with antidepressant treatment is often poor, so there is a need for a psychological treatment This study found that problem solving is an effective psychological treatment for major depression in primary care—as effective as amitriptyline and more effective than placebo Problem solving is a feasible treatment in primary care, being effective when given over six sessions by a general practitioner Problem solving treatment is acceptable to patientsThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Edinburgh primary care depression study: treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, and cost after 16 weeks.BMJ, 1992
- Evaluation of a brief psychological treatment for emotional disorders in primary carePsychological Medicine, 1991
- Evaluation of a Modified Self-Report Measure of Social AdjustmentThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- The treatment of depression in general practice: a comparison of L-tryptophan, amitriptyline, and a combination of L-tryptophan and amitriptyline with placeboPsychological Medicine, 1982
- The Efficacy of Cognitive Therapy in Depression: A Treatment Trial Using Cognitive Therapy and Pharmacotherapy, each Alone and in CombinationThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1981
- The natural history of depression in general practice: stochastic modelsPsychological Medicine, 1981
- Social work effectiveness in the management of depressed women: a clinical trialPsychological Medicine, 1981
- Depression: Treatment compliance in general practiceActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1981
- Controlled Trial of Amitriptyline in General PracticeBMJ, 1971
- Depressive Illness in a General Practice. A Demographic Study and a Controlled Trial of ImipramineBMJ, 1970