A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor
- 30 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
- Vol. 107 (4), 513-518
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.026
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors influencing the resonance frequency of dental implantsJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003
- A comparative study of osseointegration of Avana implants in a demineralized freeze-dried bone alone or with platelet-rich plasmaJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2002
- The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface:Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2002
- Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant‐tissue interface using resonance frequency analysisClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 1995
- Pathogenesis of implant failuresPeriodontology 2000, 1994
- Assessment of oral implant mobilityThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1993
- A finite element analysis of the push‐out test: Influence of test conditionsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1992
- Osseointegrated Oral ImplantsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1988
- Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixturesInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1986