X‐inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected
- 13 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cellular Physiology
- Vol. 216 (2), 445-452
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21411
Abstract
The clinical and research value of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) depends upon maintaining their epigenetically naïve, fully undifferentiated state. Inactivation of one X chromosome in each cell of mammalian female embryos is a paradigm for one of the earliest steps in cell specialization through formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mouse ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst stage embryos prior to X‐inactivation, and cultured murine ES cells initiate this process only upon differentiation. Less is known about human X‐inactivation during early development. To identify a human ES cell model for X‐inactivation and study differences in the epigenetic state of hESC lines, we investigated X‐inactivation in all growth competent, karyotypically normal, NIH approved, female hESC lines and several sublines. In the vast majority of undifferentiated cultures of nine lines examined, essentially all cells exhibit hallmarks of X‐inactivation. However, subcultures of any hESC line can vary in X‐inactivation status, comprising distinct sublines. Importantly, we identified rare sublines that have not yet inactivated Xi and retain competence to undergo X‐inactivation upon differentiation. Other sublines exhibit defects in counting or maintenance of XIST expression on Xi. The few hESC sublines identified that have not yet inactivated Xi may reflect the earlier epigenetic state of the human ICM and represent the most promising source of NIH hESC for study of human X‐inactivation. The many epigenetic anomalies seen indicate that maintenance of fully unspecialized cells, which have not formed Xi facultative heterochromatin, is a delicate epigenetic balance difficult to maintain in culture. J. Cell. Physiol. 216: 445–452, 2008.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self‐renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phaseJournal of Cellular Physiology, 2006
- Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signatureGenome Research, 2006
- X‐Inactivation Status Varies in Human Embryonic Stem Cell LinesThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 2005
- A Chromosomal Memory Triggered by Xist Regulates Histone Methylation in X InactivationPLoS Biology, 2004
- Variability of X chromosome inactivation: effect on levels of TIMP1 RNA and role of DNA methylationHuman Genetics, 2002
- Epigenetic Instability in ES Cells and Cloned MiceScience, 2001
- Low-Copy-Number Human Transgene Is Recognized as an X Inactivation Center in Mouse ES Cells, but Fails to Induce cis-Inactivation in Chimeric MiceGenomics, 2001
- Human X Inactivation Center Induces Random X Chromosome Inactivation in Male Transgenic MiceGenomics, 1999
- Stabilization and Localization of Xist RNA are Controlled by Separate Mechanisms and are Not Sufficient for X InactivationThe Journal of cell biology, 1998
- XIST expression from the maternal X chromosome in human male preimplantation embryos at the blastocyst stageHuman Molecular Genetics, 1997