Heterogeneity of Tensile Strength and Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in the Wall of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by International Society of Endovascular Specialists in Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Vol. 11 (4), 494-502
- https://doi.org/10.1583/04-1239.1
Abstract
Purpose: To measure the tensile strength of the aneurysm wall and the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity in similar samples of aortic tissue. Methods: Detailed mechanical testing was conducted on 124 standardized specimens of aneurysm wall harvested from 24 patients undergoing elective aneurysm repair. The intrasac pressure required to cause aneurysm rupture was calculated based upon the Law of Laplace. In addition, MMP-2 and 9 were assayed from these specimens. Sixty specimens of nonaneurysmal aorta from 6 cadaveric organ donors served as controls. Intrasubject and intersubject variations were analyzed. Results: In the aneurysm specimens, the Young's modulus was 1.80times106 N/m2, the load at break was 6.36 N, the strain at break was 0.30, the ultimate strength was 0.53times106 N/m2, and the MMP activity was 312 for MMP-2 and 460 for MMP-9. In the controls, the circumferential measurements were a Young's modulus of 1.82times106 N/m2, a load at break of 5.43 N, strain at break of 0.29, ultimate strength of 0.61times106 N/m2, and MMP activity of 395 for MMP-2 and 2019 for MMP-9. Longitudinal measurements in controls were a Young's modulus of 1.38times106 N/m2, a load at break of 11.39 N, a strain at break of 0.33, and ultimate strength of 1.30times106 N/m2. Intra and intersubject variation of all parameters was very high. Based upon the lowest measured tensile strength for each aneurysm, the intrasac pressure required to cause rupture varied from 142 to 982 mmHg. Conclusions: Localized “hot spots” of MMP hyperactivity could lead to focal weakening of the aneurysm wall and rupture at relatively low levels of intraluminal pressure. These data suggest that tensile strength of the sac is just as important as intrasac tension in determining the risk of rupture. Moreover, these observations may explain why some small aneurysms rupture and larger aneurysms do not. Assessment of rupture risk based on computation or measurement of wall stress may be subject to error and inaccuracy due to variations in wall tensile strength.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameterJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- Intra-aneurysm pressure measurements in successfully excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repairJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2003
- In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture riskJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2002
- Proteolysis of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall and the Association with RuptureEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2002
- How Should Endotension Be Defined?Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 2000
- Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicabilityJournal of Biomechanics, 2000
- Endotension after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Definition, Classification, and Strategies for Surveillance and InterventionJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 1999
- Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysmsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1998
- Chronic intraaneurysmal pressure measurement: An experimental method for evaluating the effectiveness of endovascular aortic aneurysm exclusionJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- Recommended indications for operative treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysmsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1992