Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Vol. 52 (8), 1332-1342
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.011
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Australian Catholic University
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Group versus conventional antenatal care for womenEmergencias, 2015
- Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory studyWomen and Birth, 2013
- Customised birthweight models: Do they increase identification of at‐risk infants?Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2013
- Improved Obstetrical Outcomes for Adolescents in a Community-Based Outreach Program: A Matched Cohort StudyJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2012
- A common problem for neonatal intensive care units: late preterm infants, a prospective study with term controls in a large perinatal centerThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2012
- Does the way maternity care is provided affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for young women? A review of the research literatureWomen and Birth, 2012
- Australian caseload midwifery: The exception or the ruleWomen and Birth, 2012
- Does young maternal age increase the risk of adverse obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort studyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2009
- Group Prenatal Care and Perinatal OutcomesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort studyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007