Clinical Implications of Clinically Insignificant Stone Fragments After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Urology
- p. 1186-1190
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199604000-00005
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- First and Second Generation Lithotripsy in Children: Results, Comparison and FollowupJournal of Urology, 1995
- Effect of Alkaline Citrate Therapy on Clearance of Residual Renal Stone Fragments after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Sterile Calcium and Infection Nephrolithiasis PatientsJournal of Urology, 1994
- Fate of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 LithotripterJournal of Endourology, 1993
- Long‐term Stone Regrowth and Recurrence Rates after Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyPublished by Wiley ,1993
- Efficacy of Second Generation Lithotriptors: A Multicenter Comparative Study of 2,206 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone LithotriptorsJournal of Urology, 1992
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Retreatment (“Stir-Up”) Promotes Discharge of Persistent Caliceal Stone Fragments after Primary Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1992
- Does Further Extracorporeal Lithotripsy Promote Clearance of Small Residual Fragments?British Journal of Urology, 1991
- First UK Consensus Conference on Lithotriptor Terminology–1989British Journal of Urology, 1991
- Two-Year Follow-up of Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Endourology, 1988
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Methodist Hospital of Indiana ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1986