Author Self-Citation in the General Medicine Literature
Open Access
- 16 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (6), e20885
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020885
Abstract
Author self-citation contributes to the overall citation count of an article and the impact factor of the journal in which it appears. Little is known, however, about the extent of self-citation in the general clinical medicine literature. The objective of this study was to determine the extent and temporal pattern of author self-citation and the article characteristics associated with author self-citation. We performed a retrospective cohort study of articles published in three high impact general medical journals (JAMA, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine) between October 1, 1999 and March 31, 2000. We retrieved the number and percentage of author self-citations received by the article since publication, as of June 2008, from the Scopus citation database. Several article characteristics were extracted by two blinded, independent reviewers for each article in the cohort and analyzed in multivariable linear regression analyses. Since publication, author self-citations accounted for 6.5% (95% confidence interval 6.3–6.7%) of all citations received by the 328 articles in our sample. Self-citation peaked in 2002, declining annually thereafter. Studies with more authors, in cardiovascular medicine or infectious disease, and with smaller sample size were associated with more author self-citations and higher percentage of author self-citation (all p≤0.01). Approximately 1 in 15 citations of articles in high-profile general medicine journals are author self-citations. Self-citation peaks within about 2 years of publication and disproportionately affects impact factor. Studies most vulnerable to this effect are those with more authors, small sample size, and in cardiovascular medicine or infectious disease.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical JournalsJAMA, 2009
- Author self‐citation pattern in scienceLibrary Review, 2009
- Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal, 2007
- Characteristics Associated with Citation Rate of the Medical LiteraturePLOS ONE, 2007
- “Eigenlob”: self‐citation in biomedical journalsThe FASEB Journal, 2006
- Author self-citation in the diabetes literatureCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publicationJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003
- Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determinationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2002
- Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?BMJ, 1996
- On the Heterogeneity and Classification of Author Self-CitationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1982