Tibial Post Wear in Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Vol. 83 (3), 390-397
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200103000-00011
Abstract
With extensive use of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants, it is increasingly important to assess the mechanical performance of this design alternative. The purpose of this study was to examine the wear patterns at the femoral cam-tibial post interface in a series of posterior stabilized prostheses retrieved at revision arthroplasty. Qualitative and quantitative wear analysis was performed over the surface of the stabilizing posts from twenty-three retrieved total knee components that had been implanted for a mean of 35.6 months (range, 2.3 to 107.2 months). The implants were designs from four different manufacturers. Digital images of the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral surfaces of the tibial post were made for quantitative analysis and determination of a post wear score. Wear was characterized with a grading system that isolates adhesive, abrasive, and fatigue wear, inferring a weighted score from an estimation of generated polyethylene debris. Evidence of wear or damage was observed on all twenty-three of the stabilizing posts, including those revised because of infection. On the average, 39.9% (range, 18.5% to 60%) of the post surface demonstrated some form of deformation, with adhesive wear, or burnishing, being the predominant wear mechanism. Seven posts (30%) exhibited severe damage with gross loss of polyethylene. The wear caused premature failure and early revision of two components: one of these failures was related to isolated post wear and the other, to severe post wear and subsequent fracture. Overall, wear was primarily posterior, but wear over the anterior, medial, and lateral surfaces was also notable. The cam-post articulation in posterior stabilized implants can be an additional source of polyethylene wear debris. The variability in wear patterns observed among designs may be due to differences in cam-post mechanics, post location, and post geometry. The surgeon should be aware that the cam-post interface is not an innocuous articulation, and manufacturers should be motivated to produce implants that maintain the function of the post while limiting wear and surface damage.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current Concepts Review - Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements*The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1999
- Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties: A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prosthesesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1997
- The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1995
- Long-term survival analysis of the posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty: A 10-year evaluationThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1989
- Wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prosthesesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1988
- Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: A method and its application to 48 total condylar prosthesesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1983
- Wear of polymers: an essay on fundamental aspectsTribology International, 1981