Routine spinal immobilization in trauma patients: What are the advantages and disadvantages?
- 31 August 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Surgeon
- Vol. 8 (4), 218-222
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.01.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Motion of a Cadaver Model of Cervical Injury During Endotracheal Intubation With a Bullard Laryngoscope or a Macintosh Blade With and Without In-line StabilizationThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- The Prognosis of Acute Blunt Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- Craniocervical Motion during Direct Laryngoscopy and Orotracheal Intubation with the Macintosh and Miller BladesAnesthesiology, 2007
- LITIGATION OF MISSED CERVICAL SPINE INJURIES IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH BLUNT TRAUMATIC INJURYNeurosurgery, 2007
- Patterns of Errors Contributing to Trauma MortalityAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Spinal immobilization in trauma patients: is it really necessary?Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2002
- Respiratory effects of spinal immobillzatlonPrehospital Emergency Care, 1999
- Dysphagia caused by a hard cervical collarBritish Journal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- Rigid cervical collars and intracranial pressureIntensive Care Medicine, 1991
- Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking manAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988