Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Associated Low-Back and Leg Pain Over Two Years
- 9 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 78 (1-2), 178-184
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2011
- Minimally Invasive Approach versus Traditional Open Approach for One Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusionmin - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2010
- Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experienceInternational Orthopaedics, 2008
- Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocolBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationallyThe Spine Journal, 2008
- Comparison of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed With a Minimally Invasive Approach or a Traditional Open ApproachSpine, 2007
- United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003Spine, 2006
- Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scaleAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2001
- Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ-5D) Health States in an Adult US SamplePharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Intel-correlation and Test-Retest Reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and Their Correlation with Pain Intensity in Low Back Pain PatientsThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 1993