The influence of signal variation, bias, noise and effect size on statistical significance in treatment studies of the common cold
- 31 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Antiviral Research
- Vol. 29 (2-3), 287-295
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3542(95)00935-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incubation Periods of Experimental Rhinovirus Infection and IllnessClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Clemastine Fumarate for Treatment of Experimental Rhinovirus ColdsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Ineffectiveness of oral terfenadine in natural coldsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1988
- The Effectiveness of Antihistamines in the Common ColdThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Effectiveness of antihistamines in the symptomatic management of the common coldPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1979
- Pathogenesis of Rhinovirus Common Colds in Human VolunteersAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1970
- Rhinovirus infections in an industrial population. II. Characteristics of illness and antibody responsePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1967
- Rhinovirus Infections in an Industrial PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- VIROLOGIC STUDIES OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISEASE IN YOUNG ADULTSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1966
- Studies with Rhinoviruses in Volunteers: Production of Illness, Effect of Naturally Acquired Antibody, and Demonstration of a Protective Effect Not Associated with Serum Antibody*JCI Insight, 1964