How do floral display size and the density of surrounding flowers influence the likelihood of bumble bee revisitation to a plant?
Open Access
- 7 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Functional Ecology
- Vol. 21 (1), 87-95
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01211.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpureaFunctional Ecology, 2005
- The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patternsFunctional Ecology, 2004
- Pollinator individuality: when does it matter?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Direct and indirect estimates of the selfing rate in small and large individuals of the bumblebee pollinated Cynoglossum officinale L (Boraginaceae)Ecology Letters, 1999
- Patch use by bumblebees (Hymenoptera Apidae): temperature, wind, flower density and trapliningEthology Ecology & Evolution, 1999
- Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed setOecologia, 1998
- Trapline foraging by bumble bees: III. Temporal patterns of visitation and foraging success at single plantsBehavioral Ecology, 1998
- Trapline foraging by bumble bees: II. Definition and detection from sequence dataBehavioral Ecology, 1997
- Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators ofAralia hispidaEvolutionary Ecology, 1988
- Kendall's Tau with a Blocking VariableBiometrics, 1984