Current Construct Options for Revision of Large Acetabular Defects
- 8 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in JBJS Reviews
- Vol. 4 (11), e2
- https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.15.00119
Abstract
Background: Many treatment options are available for the revision of large acetabular defects. Debate continues as to which technique is most effective. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for large acetabular defects. Quality assessment was performed next with use of 8 items of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for reports of observational studies. Large acetabular defects were defined as American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) type III or IV or Paprosky type 3A or 3B. Outcomes included re-revision, radiographic loosening, complications, and clinical outcomes. Results: We found 7 different treatment options for large acetabular defects in 20 included studies: antiprotrusio cage (8 studies), Trabecular Metal (Zimmer) augment and shell (4 studies), bone impaction grafting with a metal mesh (2 studies), hemispherical implant with hook and flanges (2 studies), Trabecular Metal augment or structural allograft with cup (2 studies), cup-cage reconstruction (1 study), and custom-made triflange component (1 study). Conclusions: Trabecular Metal augments and shells gave the most promising results in terms of the re-revision rate and radiographic loosening. Reconstruction with an antiprotrusio cage was the most frequently reported technique, with good results in a physically low-demand elderly population. Bone impaction grafting seems not appropriate for pelvic discontinuity and prone to failure in patients with Paprosky type-3B defects. In those cases, a custom-made triflange implant or a cup-cage reconstruction might be the best alternative, but few reports of sufficient quality are available yet. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone lossActa Orthopaedica, 2012
- Tantalum Augments for Paprosky IIIA Defects Remain Stable at Midterm FollowupClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Pelvic Discontinuity Treated With Custom Triflange Component: A Reliable OptionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- The Burch-Schneider Cage: 9-Year Survival in Paprosky Type 3 Acetabular Defects. Clinical and Radiological Follow-UpHIP International, 2012
- Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defectJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2012
- The Survival and Fate of Acetabular Reconstruction With Impaction Grafting for Large DefectsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Acetabular Revision with Metal Mesh, Impaction Bone Grafting, and a Cemented CupClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- A Review of the Treatment of Pelvic DiscontinuityHSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2008
- The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgeryThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- Management of massive acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2003