Geostatistical analysis of cone penetration test (CPT) sounding using the modified Bartlett test
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Geotechnical Journal
- Vol. 41 (2), 356-365
- https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-091
Abstract
More in situ tests are typically carried out over the same volume of soil in comparison to laboratory tests on undisturbed borehole samples. Hence, geostatistical analysis of in situ test records should in principle provide a more accurate and representative overview of spatial variation. A natural probabilistic model for correlated spatial data is the random field. Although the random field provides a concise description of spatial variation, it poses considerable practical difficulties for statistical inference because of the underlying autocorrelation structure. This note presents an extended discussion of the modified Bartlett random field estimation procedure, which is capable of rejecting the null hypothesis of weak stationarity for spatially correlated data. In comparison with simple visual inspection and the standard run test, the modified Bartlett test is shown to provide three advantages: (i) it is a more consistent measure that is unaffected by the vagaries of subjective interpretation; (ii) it is sufficiently discriminative to decide if a section is stationary, even when visual clues are ambiguous; and (iii) it is capable of accommodating realistic constraints (e.g., short record length). The possibility of identifying secondary soil boundaries that may not be readily apparent from visual inspection of cone soundings, its robustness to alternate transformations of the cone data, and the sensitivity of the proposed procedure to different levels of significance are discussed.Key words: geostatistics, random field, stationarity, modified Bartlett test, level of significance, run test.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Statistically Homogeneous Soil Layers Using Modified Bartlett StatisticsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003
- An overview of soil heterogeneity: quantification and implications on geotechnical field problemsCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003
- Estimation for Stochastic Soil ModelsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999
- Inaccuracies Associated with Estimating Random Measurement ErrorsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997
- Estimating Autocovariance of In‐Situ Soil PropertiesJournal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993
- Closure to “ Probabilistic Potentiometric Surface Mapping ” by Pinnaduwa H. S. W. Kulatilake (November, 1989, Vol. 115, No. 11)Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991
- Discussion of “ Probabilistic Potentiometric Surface Mapping ” by Pinnaduwa H. S. W. Kulatilake (November, 1989, Vol. 115, No. 11)Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991
- Soil classification using the cone penetration testCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990
- A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedureAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 1978
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974