A Randomized Trial of Planned Cesarean or Vaginal Delivery for Twin Pregnancy
- 3 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 369 (14), 1295-1305
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1214939
Abstract
Twin birth is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton birth. It is unclear whether planned cesarean section results in a lower risk of adverse outcomes than planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy. We randomly assigned women between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation with twin pregnancy and with the first twin in the cephalic presentation to planned cesarean section or planned vaginal delivery with cesarean only if indicated. Elective delivery was planned between 37 weeks 5 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, with the fetus or infant as the unit of analysis for the statistical comparison. A total of 1398 women (2795 fetuses) were randomly assigned to planned cesarean delivery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to planned vaginal delivery. The rate of cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal-delivery group. Women in the planned-cesarean-delivery group delivered earlier than did those in the planned-vaginal-delivery group (mean number of days from randomization to delivery, 12.4 vs. 13.3; P=0.04). There was no significant difference in the composite primary outcome between the planned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery group (2.2% and 1.9%, respectively; odds ratio with planned cesarean delivery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.74; P=0.49). In twin pregnancy between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation, with the first twin in the cephalic presentation, planned cesarean delivery did not significantly decrease or increase the risk of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, as compared with planned vaginal delivery. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00187369; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN74420086.)Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery?Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012
- Trends in Cesarean Delivery for Twin Births in the United StatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- Trends in Cesarean Delivery for Twin Births in the United StatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2007
- Determinants of Perinatal Mortality and Serious Neonatal Morbidity in the Second TwinObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery‐related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 birthsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnanciesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 1999
- Randomized management of the second nonvertex twin: Vaginal delivery or cesarean sectionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987