Physical Performance and Cardiovascular Responses to an Acute Bout of Heavy Resistance Circuit Training versus Traditional Strength Training
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 22 (3), 667-671
- https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e31816a588f
Abstract
Circuit training effectively reduces the time devoted to strength training while allowing an adequate training volume to be achieved. Nonetheless, circuit training has traditionally been performed using relatively low loads for a relatively high number of repetitions, which is not conducive to maximal muscle size and strength gain. This investigation compared physical performance parameters and cardiovascular load during heavy-resistance circuit (HRC) training to the responses during a traditional, passive rest strength training set (TS). Ten healthy subjects (age, 26 ± 1.6 years; weight, 80.2 ± 8.78 kg) with strength training experience volunteered for the study. Testing was performed once weekly for 3 weeks. On day 1, subjects were familiarized with the test and training exercises. On the subsequent 2 test days, subjects performed 1 of 2 strength training programs: HRC (5 sets × (bench press + leg extensions + ankle extensions); 35-second interset rest; 6 repetition maximum [6RM] loads) or TS (5 sets × bench press; 3-minute interset rest, 6RM loads). The data confirm that the maximum and average bar velocity and power and the number of repetitions performed of the bench press in the 2 conditions was the same; however, the average heart rate was significantly greater in the HRC compared to the TS condition (HRC = 129 ± 15.6 beats·min-1, ~71% maximum heart rate (HRmax), TS = 113 ± 13.1 beats·min-1, ~62% HRmax; P \u3c 0.05). Thus, HRC sets are quantitatively similar to traditional strength training sets, but the cardiovascular load is substantially greater. HRC may be an effective training strategy for the promotion of both strength and cardiovascular adaptationsKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise PrescriptionMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004
- Skeletal muscle and hormonal adaptations to circuit weight training in untrained menScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2004
- The Role of Resistance Exercise Intensity on Muscle Fibre AdaptationsSports Medicine, 2004
- Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy AdultsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2002
- Circuit weight training and its effects on excess postexercise oxygen consumptionMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1999
- ACSM Position Stand: The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy AdultsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998
- Endogenous Anabolic Hormonal and Growth Factor Responses to Heavy Resistance Exercise in Males and FemalesInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991
- Cardiovascular adaptations to resistance trainingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1988
- Physiologic Responses to Heavy-Resistance Exercise with Very Short Rest Periods*International Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987
- Alterations in Strength and Maximal Oxygen Uptake Consequent to Nautilus Circuit Weight TrainingResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1985