The performance and aerobic endurance effects of high-intensity versus moderate-intensity continuous running
Open Access
- 1 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Vol. 44 (9), 990-996
- https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2018-0575
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the performance and aerobic endurance effects of high-intensity (HICR) versus moderate-intensity continuous running (MICR), which were nonmatched for total work. Twenty healthy recreational athletes (aged 28 +/- 5 years) were randomly assigned to an HICR, MICR, or no-intervention control (C) group. The HICR group (n = 7) performed a 20-min strenuous, almost exhausting, run above lactate threshold (LT) at similar to 88% of maximal heart rate (HRmax), whereas the MICR group (n = 7) performed a 40-min run at similar to 80% HRmax. Both the HICR and MICR groups performed 3 intervention sessions a week, in addition to similar to 60% of their regular aerobic exercise, for 10 weeks. The C group (n = 6) performed regular physical exercise throughout the study. Time to exhaustion, during a similar to 4-8-min ramp test procedure, was significantly increased by 23% and 24% (P < 0.01) following HICR or MICR, respectively, with no significant difference in the change in time to exhaustion (P = 1.00) at pre- to post-training between the 2 training modalities (HICR and MICR). In the HICR group, maximal oxygen consumption and velocity at LT increased significantly by 5.0% and 6.8% (P < 0.01), respectively. The MICR group increased relative maximal oxygen consumption (mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) significantly by 4.7% (P < 0.05), whereas the pulmonary respiratory gas-exchange ratio was significantly decreased at a submaximal workload by 4.2% (P < 0.01), indicating enhanced fat oxidation. No performance or physiological effects were observed in the C group. The present study indicates that even with a substantially lower total energy turnover, HICR can be as performance enhancing as MICR. Moreover, HICR can increase maximal aerobic power, whereas MICR may enhance fat oxidation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interval and Strength Training in CAD PatientsInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Aerobic High Intensity One-Legged Interval Cycling Improves Peak Oxygen Uptake in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients; No Additional Effect from HyperoxiaInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Superior Cardiovascular Effect of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure PatientsCirculation, 2007
- Validity and Stability of a Computerized Metabolic System with Mixing ChamberInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Aerobic endurance training improves soccer performanceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Rate of accumulation of blood lactate during graded exercise as a predictor of ‘anaerobic threshold’Journal of Sports Sciences, 1993
- Development of maximal oxygen uptake in young elite male cross‐country skiers: A longitudinal studyJournal of Sports Sciences, 1992
- Factors influencing assessment of maximal heart rateScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 1991
- Maximal oxygen uptake as a predictor of performance ability in women and men elite cross‐country skiersScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 1991
- The Interactions of Intensity, Frequency and Duration of Exercise Training in Altering Cardiorespiratory FitnessSports Medicine, 1986