Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association
Open Access
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
- Vol. 34 (3), 185-190
- https://doi.org/10.1783/147118908784734873
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carcinogenicity of combined oestrogen-progestagen contraceptives and menopausal treatmentThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic reviewThe Lancet, 2003
- Invited commentary: shifting the burden of proof regarding biases and low-magnitude associations.American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Recurrent use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism.Human Reproduction, 2000
- First-time use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolismContraception, 1997
- Effect of different progestagens in low oestrogen oral contraceptives on venous thromboembolic diseaseThe Lancet, 1995
- Racial Differences in Risk of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer: Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other DeterminantsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- The need for randomization in the study of intended effectsStatistics in Medicine, 1983
- CONCEPTS OF INTERACTIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980
- INTERACTION IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1978