Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: The importance of time delays in a stochastic environment
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Evolutionary Ecology
- Vol. 10 (1), 105-117
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01239351
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defended Fortresses or Moving Targets? Another Model of Inducible Defenses Inspired by Military MetaphorsThe American Naturalist, 1994
- Plant defence and stochastic risk of herbivoryEvolutionary Ecology, 1994
- Inducible Defenses and the Allocation of Resources: A Minimal ModelThe American Naturalist, 1992
- Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environmentsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1990
- Morphogenetic basis for phenotypic differences in hydroid competitive behaviourNature, 1990
- Indirect prey effects: Some morphological and life history responses of Daphnia pulex exposed to Notonecta undulata1Limnology and Oceanography, 1988
- Diet-Induced Head Allometry Among Foliage-Chewing Insects and Its Importance for GraminivoresScience, 1986
- Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcomeJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1967
- Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in PlantsAdvances in Genetics, 1965
- MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC HETEROGENEITYCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1955