Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Open Access
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Mathematical Statistics in Statistical Science
- Vol. 14 (1), 29-46
- https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009211805
Abstract
Consideration of confounding is fundamental to the design and analysis of studies of causal effects. Yet, apart from confounding in experimental designs, the topic is given little or no discussion in most statistics texts. We here provide an overview of confounding and related concepts based on a counterfactual model for causation. Special attention is given to definitions of confounding, problems in control of confounding, the relation of confounding to exchangeability and collapsibility, and the importance of distinguishing confounding from noncollapsibility.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causal Inference in Infectious DiseasesEpidemiology, 1995
- Causal diagrams for empirical researchBiometrika, 1995
- Adjusting for Differential Rates of Prophylaxis Therapy for PCP in High-Versus Low-Dose AZT Treatment Arms in an AIDS Randomized TrialJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1994
- Randomization, Statistics, and Causal InferenceEpidemiology, 1990
- Choosing among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower TrainingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- Statistics and Causal InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMathematical Modelling, 1986
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Pertinency of an extraneous variableJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967
- Components of a Difference Between Two Rates*Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1955