Re-evaluating the role of the MFM specialist: Lead, follow, or get out of the way
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Vol. 18 (4), 253-258
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500246292
Abstract
To assess the effect of sub-specialty prenatal care provided to high-risk obstetrical patients in a community perinatal center as a function of whether consultation and referral to a Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) sub-specialist was at the discretion of the generalist, required by the insurance carrier, or by patient choice. Demographics, management, and perinatal outcomes for high-risk patients managed exclusively by MFM were compared with those managed by generalists who were later referred to MFM after problems arose. Despite similar demographics, high-risk patients managed exclusively by a single MFM had less prematurity, lower cesarean section rates, fewer low 5-minute Apgar scores (1.3% vs. 5.5%, p < 0.001), and lower perinatal mortality rates (8.0/1000 vs. 47.6/1000, p < 0.001) than those referred at a later date. In this setting, earlier MFM care resulted in better outcomes. These data suggest that the 'gatekeeper' model of generalist to MFM might be better the other way around.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Tennessee Medicaid Managed Care On Obstetrical Care and Birth OutcomesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Harry and Louise and Health Care Reform: Romancing Public OpinionJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Can Efficiency in Health Care Be Left to the Market?Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2001
- Who Should Determine When Health Care is Medically Necessary?The New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Market forces and unsponsored research in academic health centers.Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999
- Gynecologic surgery: An imperiled ballet: Presidential addressAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- The Changing Pattern of Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, Using Different Prenatal Care IndicesJAMA, 1998
- Relation of the Content of Prenatal Care to the Risk of Low Birth WeightJAMA, 1994
- A Clinical Perspective on Organizational DevelopmentPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1991