Why don't we find more polymorphs?
Open Access
- 18 July 2013
- journal article
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials
- Vol. 69 (4), 313-328
- https://doi.org/10.1107/s2052519213018861
Abstract
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) studies are not limited to being a search for the most thermodynamically stable crystal structure, but play a valuable role in understanding polymorphism, as shown by interdisciplinary studies where the crystal energy landscape has been explored experimentally and computationally. CSP usually produces more thermodynamically plausible crystal structures than known polymorphs. This article illustrates some reasons why: because (i) of approximations in the calculations, particularly the neglect of thermal effects (see §1.1); (ii) of the molecular rearrangement during nucleation and growth (see §1.2); (iii) the solid-state structures observed show dynamic or static disorder, stacking faults, other defects or are not crystalline and so represent more than one calculated structure (see §1.3); (iv) the structures are metastable relative to other molecular compositions (see §1.4); (v) the right crystallization experiment has not yet been performed (see §1.5) or (vi) cannot be performed (see §1.6) and the possibility (vii) that the polymorphs are not detected or structurally characterized (see §1.7). Thus, we can only aspire to a general predictive theory for polymorphism, as this appears to require a quantitative understanding of the kinetic factors involved in all possible multi-component crystallizations. For a specific molecule, analysis of the crystal energy landscape shows the potential complexity of its crystallization behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 141 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determination of the Crystal Structure of a New Polymorph of TheophyllineChemistry – A European Journal, 2013
- Four Polymorphs of Methyl Paraben: Structural Relationships and Relative Energy DifferencesCrystal Growth & Design, 2013
- Complex Polymorphic System of Gallic Acid—Five Monohydrates, Three Anhydrates, and over 20 SolvatesCrystal Growth & Design, 2012
- Nonamorphism in Flufenamic Acid and a New Record for a Polymorphic Compound with Solved StructuresJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2012
- The Complexity of Hydration of Phloroglucinol: A Comprehensive Structural and Thermodynamic CharacterizationThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2012
- Predicting Inclusion Behaviour and Framework Structures in Organic CrystalsChemistry – A European Journal, 2009
- Unmasking a Third Polymorph of a Benchmark Crystal-Structure-Prediction CompoundAngewandte Chemie-International Edition, 2009
- Polymer-Induced Heteronucleation of Tolfenamic Acid: Structural Investigation of a PentamorphJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2009
- Investigation of a Privileged Polymorphic Motif: A Dimeric ROY DerivativeCrystal Growth & Design, 2007
- Topographically directed nucleation of organic crystals on molecular single-crystal substratesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1993