Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand and Wrist: Comparison of Three Imaging Techniques
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 182 (4), 937-943
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.4.1820937
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative results from conventional high-field-strength 1.5-T MRI, 0.2-T low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography to detect and grade bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eighteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and conventional radiography of both hands and wrists. Two independent reviewers searched for the presence and extent of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis. Bone erosions (E scores) and joint-space narrowing (J scores) were evaluated at 14 and 13 sites, respectively, on conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography, using the Sharp-Genant scoring system. Synovitis (S scores) were evaluated at 13 sites on conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI. RESULTS. For the detection of bone erosions, we found no significant difference (p = 0.71) between conventional high-field-strength MRI (mean ± SD E score, 27.5 ± 9.8) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (28.8 ± 10.0), but a significant difference (p < 0.001) appeared between MRI and radiography (13.1 ± 8.3). J scores derived from MRI (conventional high-field-strength MRI, 15.2 ± 8.3; low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, 14.5 ± 10.4) were higher than those derived from radiography (12.7 ± 9.6), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.70). Conventional high-field-strength MRI (S score, 35.1 ± 8.6) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (30.8 ± 10.2) were equivalent (p = 0.14) for the evaluation of synovitis. The interobserver agreement for MRI scores was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.83–0.94). CONCLUSION. Conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI showed similar results in terms of cross-sectional grading of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger jointsAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2002
- Arthritis of the finger joints: A comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingArthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1998
- Scoring of Synovial Membrane Hypertrophy and Bone Erosions by MR Imaging in Clinically Active and Inactive Rheumatoid Arthritis of the WristScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1995
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Therapeutic StrategiesScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1994
- MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS—A COMPARISON WITH PLAIN FILM RADIOGRAPHSRheumatology, 1991
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strengthMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1986
- Long term progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1986
- How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1985