An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children
Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 75 (3), 374-385
- https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14892
Abstract
The multidisciplinary International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation presents the first fasting and aspiration prevention recommendations specific to procedural sedation, based on an extensive review of the literature. These were developed using Delphi methodology and assessment of the robustness of the available evidence. The literature evidence is clear that fasting, as currently practiced, often substantially exceeds recommended time thresholds and has known adverse consequences, for example, irritability, dehydration and hypoglycaemia. Fasting does not guarantee an empty stomach, and there is no observed association between aspiration and compliance with common fasting guidelines. The probability of clinically important aspiration during procedural sedation is negligible. In the post-1984 literature there are no published reports of aspiration-associated mortality in children, no reports of death in healthy adults (ASA physical status 1 or 2) and just nine reported deaths in adults of ASA physical status 3 or above. Current concerns about aspiration are out of proportion to the actual risk. Given the lower observed frequency of aspiration and mortality than during general anaesthesia, and the theoretical basis for assuming a lesser risk, fasting strategies in procedural sedation can reasonably be less restrictive. We present a consensus-derived algorithm in which each patient is first risk-stratified during their pre-sedation assessment, using evidence-based factors relating to patient characteristics, comorbidities, the nature of the procedure and the nature of the anticipated sedation technique. Graded fasting precautions for liquids and solids are then recommended for elective procedures based upon this categorisation of negligible, mild or moderate aspiration risk. This consensus statement can serve as a resource to practitioners and policymakers who perform and oversee procedural sedation in patients of all ages, worldwide.Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Violating Traditional NPO Guidelines With PO Contrast Before Sedation for Computed TomographyPediatric Emergency Care, 2013
- Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experienceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational studyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010
- The Incidence and Outcome of Perioperative Pulmonary Aspiration in a University Hospital: A 4-Year Retrospective AnalysisAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2006
- A review of patients with pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during anesthesia reported to the Departmental Quality Assurance CommitteeJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2006
- Safety of Inhalation of a 50% Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen PremixDrug Safety, 2006
- Preprocedural fasting and adverse events in procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: Are they related?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Preoperative fastingBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Complications associated with anaesthesiaa — prospective survey in FranceCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1986