A comparative study of terbinafine versus griseofulvin in ‘dry-type’ dermatophyte infections
- 28 February 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Vol. 24 (2), 243-246
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(91)70035-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of dermatophyte infection of the finger- and toe-nails with terbinafine (SF 86-327, Lamisil), an orally active fungicidal agentBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1989
- The successful treatment of finger Trichophyton rubrum onychomycosis with oral terbinafineClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1989
- Successful treatment of chronic tinea pedis (moccasin type) with terbinafine (Lamisil)Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1989
- Antifungal activity of the allylamine derivative terbinafine in vitroAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1987
- A comparative double blind study of ketoconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophytosisBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1985
- In-vitro studies with SF 86–327, a new orally active allylamine derivativeMedical Mycology, 1985
- A method for the determination of drug effectiveness in onychomycosis: Trials with ketoconazole and griseofulvin ultramicrosizeJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1983
- Oral Therapy with Ketoconazole for Dermatophyte Infections Unresponsive to GriseofulvinClinical Infectious Diseases, 1980
- Mycological and Clinical Evaluation of Griseofulvin for Chronic OnychomycosisBMJ, 1967