The Meaning of “Clean” in Anti-doping Education and Decision Making: Moving Toward Integrity and Conceptual Clarity
Open Access
- 13 May 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
- Vol. 4, 869704
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.869704
Abstract
With the World Anti-Doping Agency's International Standard for Education (ISE) coming into effect in 2021, the clean-sport movement is at a pivotal stage. Through this conceptual paper we juxtapose the sector-wide anti-doping education as set out in the ISE on the decision-making process at the individual level. We discuss three critical issues for the clean-sport movement. First, we make the case for doping being a “wicked” problem and outline the possible implications of this for prevention and detection. Second, we consider why we need to address regulative, normative, and cognitive components of clean sport if we are to maximize its legitimacy. Third, we critically expose the fluidity with which clean sport is defined, and the implications of defining clean sport in substance- vs. rule-based terms, which, respectively, lead to theorizing clean sport as “drug-free” vs. “cheating-free” sport. Finally, we consider the role and key components of anti-doping education and how the relevance of certain components may be dependent on the way clean sport is defined. Conceptualizing doping as a sport integrity issue, we move away from the archaic and delimiting view of clean sport as drug-free sport and conclude with recommendations on how to reconcile values-based education, awareness raising, information provision and anti-doping education within the broader scope of integrity, to support informed decision making and personal agency. To connect anti-doping education to individual-level decision making, we recommend a staggered approach in which specific education content is linked to different influences in the decision-making process, to different stages of athlete development, and to different educational goals. Emphasizing and encouraging sensemaking in anti-doping decision making offers a pragmatic approach for anti-doping education. Conceptual clarity and precise mapping of the educational goal, content, and delivery is vital for valid and meaningful evaluation of the effectiveness of anti-doping education.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- To reduce and not to reduce resource consumption? That is two questionsJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2012
- Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and normsScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2011
- Elite sportspersons and commodity control: anti-doping as quality assuranceInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2011
- A qualitative analysis of the experiences of elite athletes who have admitted to doping for performance enhancementInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2011
- Integrity and FragmentationJournal of Applied Philosophy, 2010
- The wicked and complex in education: developing a transdisciplinary perspective for policy formulation, implementation and professional practiceJournal of Education for Teaching, 2009
- “The science of doping” revisited: Fallacies of the current anti‐doping regimeEuropean Journal of Sport Science, 2009
- A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training EffectivenessEthics & Behavior, 2008
- Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005
- Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sportBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004