Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? a meta-analysis of intra-institutional results
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 77 (5), 1607-1614
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Our complication rates are lower than theirs”: Statistical critique of heart valve comparisonsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single centerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approachEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- Tricuspid valve replacement: results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses.The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- Prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve: biological or mechanical?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpointsStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prosthesesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Tricuspid valve replacement: Postoperative and long-term resultsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experienceEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1995