Assessing the Validity of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale and the Medic Prehospital Assessment for Code Stroke in an Urban Emergency Medical Services Agency
- 14 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Prehospital Emergency Care
- Vol. 17 (3), 348-353
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2013.773113
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two prehospital stroke screens in correctly classifying patients suspected of having a stroke. Secondarily, differences in the sensitivity and specificity of the two screening tools were assessed. We performed a retrospective assessment of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and the Medic Prehospital Assessment for Code Stroke (Med PACS) between March 1, 2011, and September 30, 2011, in a single emergency medical services (EMS) agency with seven local hospitals all classified as stroke-capable. We obtained data for this analysis from the EMS electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) and the Get With The Guidelines(-)Stroke (GWTG-S) registries maintained by the two local health care systems by matching on patient identifiers. The Med PACS was developed specifically for the EMS agency under study by a local team of neurologists, emergency physicians, and paramedics. All of the physical assessment elements of the CPSS were included within the Med PACS. Two additional physical assessment items, gaze and leg motor function, were included in the Med PACS. We classified patients as CPSS-positive or -negative and Med PACS-positive or -negative if any one of the physical assessment findings was present. We determined the presence of a hospital discharge diagnosis of stroke from GWTG-S. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with resultant 95% confidence intervals. We enrolled 416 patients in this study, of whom 186 (44.7%) were diagnosed with a stroke. The Med PACS scale demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.742 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.672-0.802), while the sensitivity for the CPSS was 0.790 (95% CI 0.723-0.845). The sensitivity of the CPSS was significantly higher than that of the Med PACS, with a difference of 0.048 (95% CI 0.009-0.088; p = 0.011). The specificities of these two scales were low, Med PACS 0.326 (95% CI 0.267-0.391) vs. CPSS 0.239 (95% CI 0.187-0.300), and the specificity of the Med PACS was significantly higher compared with the CPSS, with a difference in specificity of 0.086 (95% CI 0.042-0.131), p < 0.001. The two stroke scales under study demonstrated low sensitivity and specificity, with each scale performing marginally better in one of the two metrics assessed.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification Is Associated With Improved Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Ischemic StrokeCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2012
- Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2012
- The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsisThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Prehospital Notification by Emergency Medical Services Reduces Delays in Stroke EvaluationStroke, 2011
- Stroke Declines From Third to Fourth Leading Cause of Death in the United StatesStroke, 2011
- Safety and Outcomes of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke MimicsStroke, 2011
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 UpdateCirculation, 2011
- Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemiaNeurology, 2010
- Implementation Strategies for Emergency Medical Services Within Stroke Systems of CareStroke, 2007
- Identifying Stroke in the FieldStroke, 2000