Pay or Perish: The Economics of Premium Peering
- 26 January 2017
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
- Vol. 35 (2), 353-366
- https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2017.2659038
Abstract
As the Internet continues to evolve, traditional peering agreements cannot accommodate the changing market conditions. Premium peering has emerged where access providers (APs) charge content providers (CPs) for premium services beyond best-effort connectivity. Although prioritized peering raises concerns about net neutrality, the U.S. FCC exempted peering agreements from its recent ruling, as it falls short of background in the Internet peering context. In this paper, we consider the premium peering options provided by APs and study whether CPs will choose to peer. Based on a novel choice model of complementary services, we characterize the market shares and utilities of the providers under various peering decisions and identify the value of premium peering for the CPs that fundamentally determine CPs' peering decisions. We find that high-value CPs have peer pressure when low-value CPs peer; however, low-value CPs behave oppositely. The peering decisions of the high-value and low-value CPs are substantially influenced by their baseline market shares and user stickiness, respectively, but not vice versa.Keywords
Funding Information
- Huawei Innovation Research Program
- Ministry of Education of Singapore AcRF (R-252-000-572-112)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paid Prioritization and Its Impact on Net NeutralityIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2017
- The Public Option: A Nonregulatory Alternative to Network NeutralityIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2013
- The Internet is flatPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2010
- A value-based framework for internet peering agreementsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2010
- The Akamai networkACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2010
- Asymmetry and discrimination in Internet peering: evidence from the LINXInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 2009
- The Flattening Internet Topology: Natural Evolution, Unsightly Barnacles or Contrived Collapse?Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2008
- Platform Competition in Two-Sided MarketsJournal of the European Economic Association, 2003
- Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among ProductsThe Journal of Business, 1980
- The Bargaining ProblemEconometrica, 1950