Governance for Broadened Accountability: Blending Deliberate and Emergent Strategizing
- 30 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
- Vol. 36 (2), 195-217
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295992
Abstract
The nonprofit sector is challenged by increasing public and stakeholder demands for a broadened accountability. Strong expectations for performance accountability now accompany those for fiscal accountability. In response, better concepts of nonprofit accountability are being developed in the literature. However, knowledge of governance practices that can achieve broadened accountability has lagged. This article attempts to stimulate research and contribute to such knowledge by (a) synthesizing concepts of accountability presented by Behn (2001), Kearns (1996), and Boland and Schultze (1996) into two categories: rule-based and negotiable accountability; (b) developing grounded concepts concerning the practice of governance by nonprofit leaders; and (c) exploring the interrelationships of the previously discrete concepts of deliberate strategy, emergent strategy, and accountability. The study's ethnographic methods recorded and analyzed real-life interactions involving a board chair—chief executive officer pair. The article presents a detailed narrative description of these actions to convey its key concept, blended strategizing, and to provide stimulus for new practice by leaders in governance situations.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fostering Neighborhood Democracy: Legitimacy and Accountability within Loosely Coupled SystemsNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2003
- Into the Fire: Boards and Executive TransitionsNonprofit Management and Leadership, 2002
- A THEORY OF GOVERNING THE PUBLIC'S BUSINESS: Redesigning the jobs of boards, councils, and commissionsPublic Management Review, 2001
- The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- DOES ISOMORPHISM LEGITIMATE?The Academy of Management Journal, 1996
- Writing Ethnographic FieldnotesPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1995
- Effective boards: How executive directors define and develop themNonprofit Management and Leadership, 1992
- Lessons for successful nonprofit governanceNonprofit Management and Leadership, 1990
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Outline of a Theory of PracticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1977