The Treatment of Incisional Hernia
- 19 January 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH in Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
- Vol. 115 (3), 31-+
- https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0031
Abstract
Background: A meta-analysis of studies from multiple countries has shown that the incidence of incisional hernia varies from 4% to 10% depending on the type of operation. No epidemiological surveys have been conducted so far. The worst possible complication of an incisional hernia if it is not treated surgically is incarceration. In this article, we present the main surgical methods of treating this condition. We also evaluate the available randomized and controlled trials (RCTs) in which open and laparoscopic techniques were compared and analyze the patients' quality of life. Methods: We selectively searched PubMed for relevant literature using the search terms "incisional hernia" and "randomized controlled trial." 9 RCTs were included in the analysis. The endpoints of the meta-analysis were the number of reoperations, complications, and recurrences. The observed events were studied statistically by correlation of two unpaired groups with a fixed-effects model and with a random-effects model. We analyzed the quality of life in our own patient cohort preoperatively vs. 1 year postoperatively on the basis of data from the European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias (EuraHS). Results: Open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for the repair of incisional hernias have similar rates of reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 0.419 favoring laparoscopy, 95% confidence interval [0.159; 1.100]; p = 0.077). The rates of surgical complications are also similar (OR 0.706; 95% CI [0.278; 1.783]; p = 0.461), although the data are highly heterogeneous, and the recurrence rates are comparable as well (OR 1.301; 95% CI [0,761; 2,225]; p = 0.336). In our own patient cohort in Wurzburg, the quality of life was better in multiple categories one year after surgery. Conclusion: The operative treatment of incisional hernia markedly improves patients' quality of life. The currently available evidence regarding the complication rates of open and laparoscopic surgical repair is highly heterogeneous, and further RCTs on this subject would therefore be desirable. Moreover, new study models are needed so that well-founded individualized treatment algorithms can be developed.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic vs Open Incisional Hernia RepairJAMA Surgery, 2013
- EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repairHernia, 2012
- A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral herniasSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniquesSurgical Endoscopy, 2009
- Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall herniasHernia, 2009
- An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical techniqueJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2007
- Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repairSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized studyHernia, 2006
- Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized studySurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- Pitfalls in retromuscular mesh repair for incisional hernia: The importance of the ?fatty triangle?Hernia, 2004