Differential activation of the human trigeminal nuclear complex by noxious and non‐noxious orofacial stimulation
- 2 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Human Brain Mapping
- Vol. 30 (11), 3772-3782
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20805
Abstract
There is good evidence from animal studies for segregation in the processing of non‐nociceptive and nociceptive information within the trigeminal brainstem sensory nuclear complex. However, it remains unknown whether a similar segregation occurs in humans, and a recent tract tracing study suggests that this segregation may not exist. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to define and compare activity patterns of the trigeminal brainstem nuclear complex during non‐noxious and noxious cutaneous and non‐noxious and noxious muscle orofacial stimulation in humans. We found that during cutaneous pain, signal intensity increased within the entire rostrocaudal extent of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (SpV), encompassing the ipsilateral oralis (SpVo), interpolaris (SpVi) and caudalis (SpVc) subdivisions. In contrast, muscle pain did not activate SpVi, but instead activated a discrete region of the ipsilateral SpVo and SpVc. Further, muscle noxious stimulation activated a region of the ipsilateral lateral pons in the region of the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus (Vp). Innocuous orofacial stimulation (lip brushing) also evoked a significant increase in signal intensity in the ipsilateral Vp; however, non‐noxious muscle stimulation showed no increase in signal in this area. The data reveal that orofacial cutaneous and muscle nociceptive information and innocuous cutaneous stimulation are differentially represented within the trigeminal nuclear complex. It is well established that cutaneous and muscle noxious stimuli evoke different perceptual, behavioural and cardiovascular changes. We speculate that the differential activation evoked by cutaneous and muscle noxious stimuli within the trigeminal sensory complex may contribute to the neural basis for these differences. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of deep and superficial experimentally induced acute pain on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in human subjectsThe Journal of Physiology, 2009
- Patterns of convergence in rat zona incerta from the trigeminal nuclear complex: Light and electron microscopic studyJournal of Comparative Neurology, 2008
- Mapping the spinal and supraspinal pathways of dynamic mechanical allodynia in the human trigeminal system using cardiac-gated fMRINeuroImage, 2007
- Descriptive and functional neuroanatomy of locus coeruleus-noradrenaline-containing neurons involvement in bradykinin-induced antinociception on principal sensory trigeminal nucleusJournal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 2006
- The trigeminal tract and nucleus procedures in treatment of atypical facial painSurgical Neurology, 2005
- Inescapable and Escapable Pain is Represented in Distinct Hypothalamic‐Midbrain Circuits: Specific Roles for aδ‐ and C‐NociceptorsExperimental Physiology, 2002
- Epidemiology of Temporomandibular Disorders: Implications for the Investigation of Etiologic FactorsCritical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1997
- Effects of Morphine Microinjections into the Trigeminal Sensory Complex on the Formalin Test in the RatExperimental Neurology, 1996
- Somatotopic and laminar organization of fos‐like immunoreactivity in the medullary and upper cervical dorsal horn induced by noxious facial stimulation in the ratJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1993
- Somatosensory nuclei in the brainstem of the rat: Independent projections to the thalamus and cerebellumJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1987