An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 39 (4), 649-661
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00632.x
Abstract
A major obstacle to broad support of clinical ethics consultation (CEC) is suspicion regarding the nature of the moral expertise it claims to offer. The suspicion seems to be confirmed when the field fails to make its moral expertise explicit. In this vacuum, critics suggest the following: (1)Clinical ethics consultation's legitimacy depends on its ability to offer an expertise in moral matters. (2)Expertise in moral matters is knowledge of a singular moral truth which applies to everyone. (3)The claim that a clinical ethics consultant can offer knowledge of a singular moral truth in virtue of her professional training is absurd, false, or gravely immoral.Therefore, (4)The field is illegitimate.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHY MORAL PHILOSOPHERS ARE NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE MORAL EXPERTSBioethics, 2011
- Moral Expertise and the Credentials ProblemEthical Theory and Moral Practice, 2007
- The goals of ethics consultation: rejecting the role of "ethics police".American Journal of Bioethics, 2007
- Autonomy and the Asymmetry Problem for Moral ExpertisePhilosophical Studies, 2006
- Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committeeJournal of Medical Ethics, 2005
- The Nature of Ethical ExpertiseHastings Center Report, 1998
- Navigators and captains: expertise in clinical ethics consultation.Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1997
- The possibility of ethical expertiseTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1994
- Offering TruthArchives of Internal Medicine, 1993
- ETHICS CONSULTATION AS MORAL ENGAGEMENTBioethics, 1991