Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs. disbelief
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in NeuroImage
- Vol. 56 (2), 544-553
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (DA023422, DA026109)
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classification of spatially unaligned fMRI scansNeuroImage, 2010
- Decoding the Large-Scale Structure of Brain Function by Classifying Mental States Across IndividualsPsychological Science, 2009
- Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dippingNature Neuroscience, 2009
- Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overviewNeuroImage, 2008
- Sparse estimation automatically selects voxels relevant for the decoding of fMRI activity patternsNeuroImage, 2008
- A single-trial analytic framework for EEG analysis and its application to target detection and classificationNeuroImage, 2008
- Automatic independent component labeling for artifact removal in fMRINeuroImage, 2007
- The impact of temporal compression and space selection on SVM analysis of single-subject and multi-subject fMRI dataNeuroImage, 2006
- Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI dataTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974