The symptom burden of cancer: Evidence for a core set of cancer‐related and treatment‐related symptoms from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 24 September 2013
- Vol. 119 (24), 4333-4340
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28376
Abstract
BACKGROUND A set of common cancer‐related and treatment‐related symptoms has been proposed for quality of care assessment and clinical research. Using data from a large, multicenter, prospective study, the authors assessed the effects of disease site and stage on the percentages of patients rating these proposed symptoms as moderate to severe. METHODS The severity of 13 symptoms proposed to represent “core” oncology symptoms was rated by 3106 ambulatory patients with cancer of the breast, prostate, colon/rectum, or lung, regardless of disease stage or phase of care; 2801 patients (90%) repeated the assessment 4 to 5 weeks later. RESULTS At the time of the initial assessment, approximately 33% of the patients reported ≥ 3 symptoms in the moderate‐to‐severe range; 11 of the 13 symptoms were rated as moderate to severe by at least 10% of all patients and 6 were rated as moderate to severe by at least 20% of those receiving active treatment. Fatigue/tiredness was the most severe symptom, followed by disturbed sleep, pain, dry mouth, and numbness/tingling. More patients with lung cancer and patients receiving active treatment reported moderate to severe symptoms. Percentages of symptomatic patients increased by disease stage, less adequate response to therapy, and declining Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The percentages of patients reporting moderate to severe symptoms were stable across both assessments. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study support a core set of moderate to severe symptoms that are common across outpatients with solid tumors, that can guide consideration of progression‐free survival as a trial outcome, and that should be considered in clinical care and in assessments of quality of care and treatment benefit. Cancer 2013;119:4333–4340. © 2013 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommendations for Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research in Adult OncologyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Do High Symptom Scores Trigger Clinical Actions? An Audit After Implementing Electronic Symptom ScreeningJournal of Oncology Practice, 2012
- Prospective, Observational Study of Pain and Analgesic Prescribing in Medical Oncology Outpatients With Breast, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Evaluation of the Value of Attribution in the Interpretation of Adverse Event Data: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group InvestigationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Age and gender differences in symptom intensity and symptom clusters among patients with metastatic cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 2010
- A Review of the Prevalence and Impact of Multiple Symptoms in Oncology PatientsJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2009
- Establishing Mild, Moderate, and Severe Scores for Cancer-Related Symptoms: How Consistent and Clinically Meaningful Are Interference-Based Severity Cut-Points?Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2008
- Asking the Community About Cutpoints Used to Describe Mild, Moderate, and Severe PainThe Journal of Pain, 2006
- Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity?Pain, 2005