State-dependent risk-taking
Open Access
- 20 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings. Biological sciences
- Vol. 285 (1881), 20180180
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0180
Abstract
Who takes risks, and when? The relative state model proposes two non-independent selection pressures governing risk-taking: need-based and ability-based. The need-based account suggests that actors take risks when they cannot reach target states with low-risk options (consistent with risk-sensitivity theory). The ability-based account suggests that actors engage in risk-taking when they possess traits or abilities that increase the expected value of risk-taking (by increasing the probability of success, enhancing payoffs for success or buffering against failure). Adaptive risk-taking involves integrating both considerations. Risk-takers compute the expected value of risk-taking based on their state—the interaction of embodied capital relative to one's situation, to the same individual in other circumstances or to other individuals. We provide mathematical support for this dual pathway model, and show that it can predict who will take the most risks and when (e.g. when risk-taking will be performed by those in good, poor, intermediate or extreme state only). Results confirm and elaborate on the initial verbal model of state-dependent risk-taking: selection favours agents who calibrate risk-taking based on implicit computations of condition and/or competitive (dis)advantage, which in turn drives patterned individual differences in risk-taking behaviour.Funding Information
- US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-15-1-0137)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430287)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weapons Make the Man (Larger): Formidability Is Represented as Size and Strength in HumansPLOS ONE, 2012
- Evolutionary Theory and the Ultimate–Proximate Distinction in the Human Behavioral SciencesPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2011
- Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision MakingSocial Cognition, 2009
- Formidability and the logic of human angerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- From Evolved Motives to Everyday Mentation: Evolution, Goals, and CognitionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2004
- Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1999
- Risk-Sensitive Foraging, Fitness, and Life Histories: Where Does Reproduction Fit into the Big Picture?American Zoologist, 1996
- AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF TASTE FOR RISKEconomic Inquiry, 1979
- Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of RiskEconometrica, 1954
- The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving RiskJournal of Political Economy, 1948