Computed Tomography Bronchus Sign and the Diagnostic Yield of Guided Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Rationale: Indeterminate peripheral pulmonary lesions often require tissue diagnosis. If non-surgical biopsy techniques are considered, deciding between bronchoscopic transbronchial vs. CT guided transthoracic biopsy can be difficult. The former has a low diagnostic yield with a low complication risk, while the latter has a better diagnostic yield but a higher complication rate. Investigators have looked at various lesion characteristics that can predict the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopic biopsies. While consensus exists that larger size and proximity to the hilum increase the diagnostic yield, there is ongoing debate about the association between CT bronchus sign (air-filled bronchus in close proximity of the lesion as seen on CT) and the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopic modalities. Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis and systematic review, determining the association between CT bronchus sign and the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2018 for guided bronchoscopy studies that had assessed the impact of CT bronchus sign on the diagnostic yield. The quality of included studies was assessed using Quality Assessment, Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc (version 18). Odds ratios were used to compare yield of lesions with and without bronchus sign. Random effects model was used when significant heterogeneity was observed (I2>40%). Results: For 2199 lesions with CT bronchus sign, the overall weighted diagnostic yield was 74.1% (95% CI: 68.3-79.5%). For 971 lesions without CT bronchus sign, the overall weighted diagnostic yield was 49.6% (95% CI: 39.6-59.5%). The odds ratio for successfully diagnosing a lesion with CT bronchus was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.4-5.0). Possible sources of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis included differences in study designs, guidance modalities and cancer prevalence. The odds ratio for successfully diagnosing a lesion with CT bronchus sign was relatively lower for prospective studies. Conclusions: Peripheral pulmonary lesions with CT bronchus sign are more likely to be diagnosed with guided bronchoscopy as compared to the lesions without CT bronchus sign. Clinicians should consider this along with the lesion size and distance from hilum, when contemplating guided bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis and systematic review, determining the impact of CT bronchus sign on the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2018 for guided bronchoscopy studies that had assessed the impact of CT bronchus sign on the diagnostic yield. The quality of included studies was assessed using Quality Assessment, Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc (version 18). Odds ratios were used to compare yield of lesions with and without bronchus sign. Random effects model was used when significant heterogeneity was observed (I2>40%). Results: For 2199 lesions with CT bronchus sign, the overall weighted diagnostic yield was 74.1% (95% CI: 68.3-79.5%). For 971 lesions without CT bronchus, the overall weighted diagnostic yield was 49.6% (95% CI: 39.6-59.5%). The odds ratio for successfully diagnosing a lesion with CT bronchus was 3.4 (95% CI: 2.4-5.0). I² index was 62.1 therefore random effects model was used. Conclusions: Peripheral pulmonary lesions with CT bronchus sign are much more likely to be successfully diagnosed with guided bronchoscopy as compared to the lesions without CT bronchus sign. Clinicians should consider the presence (or absence) of CT bronchus sign along with the size of the lesion and distance from the hilum, when contemplating guided bronchoscopic modalities for peripheral pulmonary lesions.