En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study
Open Access
- 15 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 17 (5), 715-725
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0588-y
Abstract
Wide surgical margins make en bloc spondylectomy and stabilization a referred treatment for certain tumoral lesions. With a total resection of a vertebra, the removal of the segment’s stabilizing structures is complete and the instrumentation guidelines derived from a thoracolumbar corpectomy may not apply. The influence of one or two adjacent segment instrumentation, adjunct anterior plate stabilization and vertebral body replacement (VBR) designs on post-implantational stability was investigated in an in-vitro en bloc spondylectomy model. Biomechanical in-vitro testing was performed in a six degrees of freedom spine simulator using six human thoracolumbar spinal specimens with an age at death of 64 (±20) years. Following en bloc spondylectomy eight stabilization techniques were performed using long and short posterior instrumentation, two VBR systems [(1) an expandable titanium cage; (2) a connected long carbon fiber reinforced composite VBR pedicle screw system)] and an adjunct anterior plate. Test-sequences were loaded with pure moments (±7.5 Nm) in the three planes of motion. Intersegmental motion was measured between Th12 and L2, using an ultrasound based analysis system. In flexion/extension, long posterior fixations showed significantly less range of motion (ROM) than the short posterior fixations. In axial rotation and extension, the ROM of short posterior fixation was equivalent or higher when compared to the intact state. There were only small, nonsignificant ROM differences between the long carbon fiber VBR and the expandable system. Antero-lateral plating stabilized short posterior fixations, but did not markedly effect long construct stability. Following thoracolumbar en bloc spondylectomy, it is the posterior fixation of more than one adjacent segment that determines stability. In contrast, short posterior fixation does not sufficiently restore stability, even with an antero-lateral plate. Expandable verses nonexpandable VBR system design does not markedly affect stability.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimizing errors during in vitro testing of multisegmental spine specimens: Considerations for component selection and kinematic measurementJournal of Biomechanics, 2007
- Primary malignant bone tumors and solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine: results by management with total en bloc spondylectomyEuropean Spine Journal, 2007
- Range of Motion in Reconstruction Situations Following Corpectomy in the Lumbar SpineSpine, 2005
- Anterior Thoracolumbar Instrumentation: Stiffness and Load Sharing Characteristics of Plate and Rod SystemsSpine, 2003
- Complications in surgical treatment of thoracolumbar injuriesEuropean Spine Journal, 2002
- Three-dimensional motion analysis with SynexEuropean Spine Journal, 2000
- Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumorsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1998
- Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implantsEuropean Spine Journal, 1998
- Anterior Decompression and Stabilization of the Spine as a Treatment for Vertebral Collapse and Spinal Cord Compression from Metastatic MalignancyPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1988
- Luque rod stabilization for metastatic disease of the spineSurgical Neurology, 1987