Using Statistical Procedures to Identify Differentially Functioning Test Items
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Vol. 17 (1), 31-44
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00619.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item‐Bundle DIF Hypothesis Testing: Identifying Suspect Bundles and Assessing Their Differential FunctioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- Improving the Matching for DIF Analysis by Conditioning on Both Test Score and an Educational Background VariableJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- Simulation Studies of the Effects of Small Sample Size and Studied Item Parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel‐Haenszel Type I Error PerformanceJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- A Comparison of Alternative Matching Strategies for DIF Detection in Tests That Are MultidimensionalJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- Precision and Differential Item Functioning on a Testlet-Based Test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an ExampleApplied Measurement in Education, 1995
- MH: A Fortran 77 Program to Compute the Mantel-Haenszel Statistic for Detecting Differential Item FunctioningEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
- Thin Versus Thick Matching in the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting DIFJournal of Educational Statistics, 1993
- Two New Approaches to Assessing Differential Item Functioning: Standardization and the Mantel--Haenszel MethodApplied Measurement in Education, 1989
- Evaluation of Computer Simulated Baseline Statistics for Use in Item Bias StudiesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1989
- Accounting for Statistical Artifacts in Item Bias ResearchJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984