Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production
Open Access
- 6 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 18 (4), 1097-1120
- https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
Abstract
Flood hazard mapping in the United States (US) is deeply tied to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Consequently, publicly available flood maps provide essential information for insurance purposes, but they do not necessarily provide relevant information for non-insurance aspects of flood risk management (FRM) such as public education and emergency planning. Recent calls for flood hazard maps that support a wider variety of FRM tasks highlight the need to deepen our understanding about the factors that make flood maps useful and understandable for local end users. In this study, social scientists and engineers explore opportunities for improving the utility and relevance of flood hazard maps through the co-production of maps responsive to end users' FRM needs. Specifically, two-dimensional flood modeling produced a set of baseline hazard maps for stakeholders of the Tijuana River valley, US, and Los Laureles Canyon in Tijuana, Mexico. Focus groups with natural resource managers, city planners, emergency managers, academia, non-profit, and community leaders refined the baseline hazard maps by triggering additional modeling scenarios and map revisions. Several important end user preferences emerged, such as (1) legends that frame flood intensity both qualitatively and quantitatively, and (2) flood scenario descriptions that report flood magnitude in terms of rainfall, streamflow, and its relation to an historic event. Regarding desired hazard map content, end users' requests revealed general consistency with mapping needs reported in European studies and guidelines published in Australia. However, requested map content that is not commonly produced included (1) standing water depths following the flood, (2) the erosive potential of flowing water, and (3) pluvial flood hazards, or flooding caused directly by rainfall. We conclude that the relevance and utility of commonly produced flood hazard maps can be most improved by illustrating pluvial flood hazards and by using concrete reference points to describe flooding scenarios rather than exceedance probabilities or frequencies.Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (grant DMS-1331611)
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pluvial Flooding in European Cities—A Continental Approach to Urban Flood ModellingWater, 2017
- Combined fluvial and pluvial urban flood hazard analysis: concept development and application to Can Tho city, Mekong Delta, VietnamNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2016
- Uncertainty in Flood Frequency AnalysisPublished by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd ,2014
- Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling?Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009
- Evaluation of flood hazard maps in print and web mapping services as information tools in flood risk communicationNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009
- Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and useNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2009
- Flood Risk Mapping At The Local Scale: Concepts and ChallengesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2007
- Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2005
- Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative DataPublished by SAGE Publications ,1995
- Nonparametric Tests Against TrendEconometrica, 1945