Effects of High versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 171 (9), 1002-1008
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200407-940oc
Abstract
A recent study by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network compared the traditional lower end-expiratory pressure strategy with a higher end-expiratory pressure strategy in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with low tidal volumes. Clinical outcomes were similar whether lower or higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels were used. We applied both the lower (9 +/- 2 cm H2O) and higher (16 +/- 1 cm H2O) PEEP strategy in 19 patients. In nine recruiters, the higher end-expiratory pressure strategy resulted in significant alveolar recruitment (587 +/- 158 ml), improvement in arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspired oxygen fraction ratio (from 150 +/- 36 to 396 +/- 138), and reduction in static lung elastance (from 23 +/- 3 to 20 +/- 2 cm H2O/L). In 10 nonrecruiters, alveolar recruitment was minimal, oxygenation did not improve, and static lung elastance significantly increased (from 26 +/- 5 to 28 +/- 6 cm H2O/L). The increase in oxygenation, the reduction in static lung elastance, and the shape of the volume-pressure curve during the lower PEEP strategy were independently associated with alveolar recruitment. In conclusion, the protocol proposed by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, lacking solid physiologic basis, frequently fails to induce alveolar recruitment and may increase the risk of alveolar overinflation.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Higher versus Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in Patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAnesthesiology, 2004
- Selecting the Right Level of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Use of recruitment maneuvers and high positive end-expiratory pressure in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndromeCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Inflammatory Mediators in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeJAMA, 1999
- A Scanographic Assessment of Pulmonary Morphology in Acute Lung InjuryAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Effect of a Protective-Ventilation Strategy on Mortality in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Ventilator-induced Lung InjuryAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998
- Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994