Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick (Crystal VC) for the Diagnosis of Cholera in Zanzibar and a Comparison with Previous Studies
Open Access
- 25 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (5), e36930
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036930
Abstract
The gold standard for the diagnosis of cholera is stool culture, but this requires laboratory facilities and takes at least 24 hours. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can be used by minimally trained staff at treatment centers could potentially improve the reporting and management of cholera outbreaks. We evaluated the Crystal VC™ RDT under field conditions in Zanzibar in 2009. Patients presenting to treatment centers with watery diarrhea provided a stool sample for rapid diagnostic testing. Results were compared to stool culture performed in a reference laboratory. We assessed the overall performance of the RDT and evaluated whether previous intake of antibiotics, intravenous fluids, location of testing, and skill level of the technician affected the RDT results. We included stool samples from 624 patients. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of the RDT was 93.1% (95%CI: 88.7 to 96.2%), specificity was 49.2% (95%CI: 44.3 to 54.1%), the positive predictive value was 47.0% (95%CI: 42.1 to 52.0%) and the negative predictive value was 93.6% (95%CI: 89.6 to 96.5%). The overall false positivity rate was 50.8% (213/419); fieldworkers frequently misread very faint test lines as positive. The observed sensitivity of the Crystal VC RDT evaluated was similar compared to earlier versions, while specificity was poorer. The current version of the RDT could potentially be used as a screening tool in the field. Because of the high proportion of false positive results when field workers test stool specimens, positive results will need to be confirmed with stool culture.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case for Reactive Mass Oral Cholera VaccinationsPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2011
- Diagnostic Limitations to Accurate Diagnosis of CholeraJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Evaluation of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Dipstick Kit for Diagnosis of Cholera Emphasizes Its Outbreak UtilityJapanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Field evaluation of Crystal VC® Rapid Dipstick test for cholera during a cholera outbreak in Guinea‐BissauTropical Medicine & International Health, 2009
- Predicting Treatment Cost for Bacterial Diarrhoea at a Regional Hospital in ThailandJournal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2009
- Field evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic dipstick test for the diagnosis of cholera in a high-risk populationBMC Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for cholera: does the skill level of the technician matter?Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2006
- Use of Dipsticks for Rapid Diagnosis of Cholera Caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 from Rectal SwabsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- One-Step Immunochromatographic Dipstick Tests for Rapid Detection of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in Stool SamplesClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2003
- Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive valuesBMJ, 1994