Comparison of the Biolog OmniLog Identification System and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for accuracy in identification of atypical bacteria of clinical origin
- 31 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Microbiological Methods
- Vol. 79 (3), 336-343
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2009.10.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- GenBankNucleic Acids Research, 2009
- Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratoriesClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2008
- Paenibacillus konsidensis sp. nov., isolated from a patientInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2008
- Identification of Clinical Coryneform Bacterial Isolates: Comparison of Biochemical Methods and Sequence Analysis of 16S rRNA and rpoB GenesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- GenBankNucleic Acids Research, 2007
- Systematic 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of Atypical Clinical Isolates Identified 27 New Bacterial Species Associated with HumansJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- The genome sequence of Bacillus anthracis Ames and comparison to closely related bacteriaNature, 2003
- Genome sequence of Bacillus cereus and comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracisNature, 2003
- Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programsNucleic Acids Research, 1997
- Basic local alignment search toolJournal of Molecular Biology, 1990