Effects of Reactor Design on the Torrefaction of Biomass
- 19 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by ASME International in Journal of Energy Resources Technology
- Vol. 134 (4), 041801
- https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007484
Abstract
Torrefied biomass is a green alternative to coal, and thus the interest in the torrefaction process is rising fast. Different manufacturers are offering different patented designs of torrefier with data on varying operating and process conditions each claiming their superiority over others. The choice of torrefaction technology has become exceptionally difficult because of a near absence of a comparative assessment of different types of reactors on a common base. This work attempts to fill this important knowledge gap in torrefaction technology by reviewing available types of reactors, and comparing their torrefaction performance common basis and examining the commercial implication of reactor choice. After reviewing available patent and technologies offered, torrefiers are classified broadly under two generic groups: indirectly heated and directly heated. Four generic types of reactors, convective heating, fluidized bed, rotating drum and microwave reactor were studied in this research. Convective and fluidized beds have direct heating, rotating reactors has indirect heating while microwave involves a volumetric heating (a subgroup of direct heating) mechanism. A standard sample of biomass (25 mm diameter × 64 mm long poplar wood) was torrefied in each of these types of reactors under identical conditions. The mass yield, energy density and energy yield of the wood after torrefaction were measured and compared. Rotating drum achieved lowest mass yield but highest energy density. The difference between two direct heating, convective heating and fluidized beds was small. Microwave provided only localized torrefaction in this series of tests. Indirectly heated reactors might be suitable for a plant near the biomass source while directly heated plant would give better value at the user end.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technoeconomic Analysis of Microalgae Cofiring Process for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power PlantsJournal of Energy Resources Technology, 2011
- System Analysis of Thermochemical-Based Biorefineries for Coproduction of Hydrogen and ElectricityJournal of Energy Resources Technology, 2011
- Torrefaction and co-torrefaction characterization of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin as well as torrefaction of some basic constituents in biomassEnergy, 2011
- A review of torrefaction for bioenergy feedstock productionBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2011
- Residence Time Influence on the Fast Pyrolysis of Loblolly Pine BiomassJournal of Energy Resources Technology, 2010
- Modelling anhydrous weight loss of wood chips during torrefaction in a pilot kilnBiomass and Bioenergy, 2010
- Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: A review of compositional characteristicsBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2010
- Thermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomassEnvironmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2009
- Some aspects of heat transfer in rolling mode rotating drums operated at low to medium temperaturesPowder Technology, 2001
- Surface reaction rates of coarse bituminous char particles in the temperature range 600 to 1340 KFuel, 1993