Usual Care as the Control Group in Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society
- Vol. 4 (7), 577-582
- https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200706-072jk
Abstract
We discuss the pros and cons of including usual care as a control arm in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions. Usual care is a term used to describe the full spectrum of patient care practices in which clinicians have the opportunity (which is not necessarily seized) to individualize care. The decision to use usual care as the control arm should be based on the nature of the research question and the uniformity of usual-care practices. The use of a usual-care arm in a two-arm trial should be considered for trials of investigational drugs or devices, for trials that propose to test interventions that lie well outside usual-care practices, or for trials where the research question per se is to compare a strategy against usual care. Examples of the latter include pragmatic effectiveness trials of clinical pathways or protocolized-care versus usual-care practices. Randomized intervention trials can be safely conducted and monitored using two treatments that lie within the range of usual-care practices if both approaches are considered prudent and good care for the target population.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions, ConfessionsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Disseminating Innovations in Health CareJAMA, 2003
- How Best to Ventilate? Trial Design and Patient Safety in Studies of the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Meta-Analysis of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trials Testing Low Tidal VolumesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Decision support and safety of clinical environmentsHeart, 2002
- Evidence-based medicine or fuzzy logic: what is best for ARDS management?Intensive Care Medicine, 2002
- Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Effect of Prone Positioning on the Survival of Patients with Acute Respiratory FailureThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical DecisionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Effect of a Protective-Ventilation Strategy on Mortality in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1998