Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 108 (3), 921-928
- https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181951a7f
Abstract
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor was introduced into clinical practice 20 yr ago. The PCEA technique has been shown to have significant benefits when compared with continuous epidural infusion. We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE and EMBASE (1988–April 1, 2008) of all randomized, controlled trials in parturients who received PCEA in labor in which one of the following comparisons were made: background infusion versus none; ropivacaine versus bupivacaine; high versus low concentrations of local anesthetics; and new strategies versus standard strategies. The outcomes of interest were maternal analgesia, satisfaction, motor block, and the incidence of unscheduled clinician interventions. A continuous background infusion improved maternal analgesia and reduced unscheduled clinician interventions. Larger bolus doses (more than 5 mL) may provide better analgesia compared with small boluses. Low concentrations of bupivacaine or ropivacaine provide excellent analgesia without significant motor block. Many strategies with PCEA can provide effective labor analgesia. High volume, dilute local anesthetic solutions with a continuous background infusion appear to be the most successful strategy. Research into new delivery strategies, such as mandatory programmed intermittent boluses and computerized feedback dosing, is ongoing.This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Minimum Local Anesthetic Volumes and Doses of Epidural Bupivacaine (0.125% w/v and 0.25% w/v) for Analgesia in LaborAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2007
- Comparison of computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia vs. conventional patient controlled epidural analgesia for pain relief in labourAnaesthesia, 2006
- Comparison between a disposable and an electronic PCA device for labor epidural analgesiaJournal of Anesthesia, 2004
- Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor pain: effect on labor, delivery and neonatal outcome of 0.125% bupivacaine vs 0.2% ropivacaineInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2004
- Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Fentanyl added to bupivacaine 0.05% or ropivacaine 0.05% in patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labourEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2002
- Ropivacaine, 0.1%, Plus Sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, versus Bupivacaine, 0.1%, Plus Sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, Using Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia for LaborAnesthesiology, 2000
- Motor blockade is reduced with ropivacaine 0.125% for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labourCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1999
- Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout intervalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1993
- A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labourCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1988