Default Options In Advance Directives Influence How Patients Set Goals For End-Of-Life Care
Open Access
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 32 (2), 408-417
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0895
Abstract
Although decisions regarding end-of-life care are personal and important, they may be influenced by the ways in which options are presented. To test this hypothesis, we randomly assigned 132 seriously ill patients to complete one of three types of advance directives. Two types had end-of-life care options already checked—a default choice—but one of these favored comfort-oriented care, and the other, life-extending care. The third type was a standard advance directive with no options checked. We found that most patients preferred comfort-oriented care, but the defaults influenced those choices. For example, 77 percent of patients in the comfort-oriented group retained that choice, while 43 percent of those in the life-extending group rejected the default choice and selected comfort-oriented care instead. Among the standard advance directive group, 61 percent of patients selected comfort-oriented care. Our findings suggest that patients may not hold deep-seated preferences regarding end-of-life care. The findings provide motivation for future research examining whether using default options in advance directives may improve important outcomes, including patients’ receipt of wanted and unwanted services, resource use, survival, and quality of life.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional Variation in the Association Between Advance Directives and End-of-Life Medicare ExpendituresJAMA, 2011
- Surgeons' Decisions and the Financial and Human Costs of Medical CareThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) QuestionnairePalliative Medicine, 2010
- Effect of a Disease‐Specific Planning Intervention on Surrogate Understanding of Patient Goals for Future Medical TreatmentJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before DeathThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Associations Between End-of-Life Discussions, Patient Mental Health, Medical Care Near Death, and Caregiver Bereavement AdjustmentJAMA, 2008
- The Default Effect in End-of-Life Medical Treatment PreferencesMedical Decision Making, 2007
- The Influence of Default Options on the Expression of End-of-Life Treatment Preferences in Advance DirectivesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- The construction of preference.American Psychologist, 1995
- Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisionsJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993