Interhospital Transfers Among Medicare Beneficiaries Admitted for Acute Myocardial Infarction at Nonrevascularization Hospitals
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 3 (5), 468-475
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.110.957993
Abstract
Background—: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are admitted to hospitals without coronary revascularization are frequently transferred to hospitals with this capability, yet we know little about the basis for how such revascularization hospitals are selected. Methods and Results—: We examined interhospital transfer patterns in 71 336 AMI patients admitted to hospitals without revascularization capabilities in the 2006 Medicare claims using network analysis and regression models. A total of 31 607 (44.3%) AMI patients were transferred from 1684 nonrevascularization hospitals to 1104 revascularization hospitals. Median time to transfer was 2 days. Median transfer distance was 26.7 miles, with 96.1% within 100 miles. In 45.8% of cases, patients bypassed a closer hospital to go to a farther hospital that had a better 30-day risk standardized mortality rates. However, in 36.8% of cases, another revascularization hospital with lower 30-day risk-standardized mortality was actually closer to the original admitting nonrevascularization hospital than the observed transfer destination. Adjusted regression models demonstrated that shorter transfer distances were more common than transfers to the hospitals with lowest 30-day mortality rates. Simulations suggest that an optimized system that prioritized the transfer of AMI patients to a nearby hospital with the lowest 30-day mortality rate might produce clinically meaningful reductions in mortality. Conclusions—: More than 40% of AMI patients admitted to nonrevascularization hospitals are transferred to revascularization hospitals. Many patients are not directed to nearby hospitals with the lowest 30-day risk-standardized mortality, and this may represent an opportunity for improvement.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Volume and 30-Day Mortality for Three Common Medical ConditionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Incidence and predictors of critical events during urgent air-medical transportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2009
- The Structure of Critical Care Transfer NetworksMedical Care, 2009
- Routine Early Angioplasty after Fibrinolysis for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Intensive care unit occupancy and patient outcomes*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Uncharted Paths: Hospital Networks in Critical CareSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2009
- Public Reporting of 30-Day Mortality for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart FailureCirculation, 2008
- ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency MedicineJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview surveyBMJ, 2005
- Patient Preferences for Location of CareMedical Care, 1999