What is the role of tobacco control advertising intensity and duration in reducing adolescent smoking prevalence? Findings from 16 years of tobacco control mass media advertising in Australia
Open Access
- 29 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 24 (2), 198-204
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050945
Abstract
Objective To examine how the intensity and duration of tobacco control advertising relate to adolescent smoking prevalence. Methods Australian students (aged 12–17 years) participating in a national survey conducted triennially between 1993 and 2008 (sample size range 12 314–16 611). The outcome measure was students’ smoking in the previous 4 weeks collected through anonymous, self-completed surveys. For each student, monthly targeted rating points (TRPs, a measure of television advertising exposure) for tobacco control advertising was calculated for the 3 and 12 months prior to surveying. For each time period, cumulative TRPs exposure and exposure to three intensity levels (≥100 TRPs/month; ≥400 TRPs/month; ≥800 TRPs/month) over increasing durations (eg, 1 month, 2 months, etc) were calculated. Logistic regression examined associations between TRPs and adolescent smoking after controlling for demographic and policy variables. Results Past 3-month cumulative TRPs were found to have an inverse relationship with smoking prevalence. Low TRPs exposure in the past 12 months was positively associated with adolescent smoking prevalence. However, smoking prevalence reduced with cumulative exposure levels above 5800 cumulative TRPs. Additionally, exposure to ≥400 TRPs/month and ≥800 TRPs/month were associated with reduced likelihood of smoking, although the duration needed for this effect differed for the two intensity levels. When intensity was ≥400 TRPs/month, the odds of smoking only reduced with continuous exposure. When intensity was ≥800 TRPs/month, exposure at levels less than monthly was associated with reductions in smoking prevalence. Conclusions Both antismoking advertising intensity and duration are important for ensuring reductions in adolescent smoking prevalence.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- What impact have tobacco control policies, cigarette price and tobacco control programme funding had on Australian adolescents' smoking? Findings over a 15-year periodAddiction, 2011
- Uncovering the most effective active ingredients of antismoking public service announcements: The role of actor and message characteristicsNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2009
- The Impact of National Smoking Prevention Campaigns on Tobacco-Related Beliefs, Intentions to Smoke and Smoking Initiation: Results from a Longitudinal Survey of Youth in the United StatesInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2009
- Can population-based tobacco-control policies change smoking behaviors of adolescents from all socio-economic groups? Findings from Australia: 1987–2005Cancer Causes & Control, 2008
- Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaignHealth Education Research, 2008
- State Anti-Tobacco Advertising and Smoking Outcomes by Gender and Race/EthnicityEthnicity & Health, 2007
- Antismoking Advertisements for Youths: An Independent Evaluation of Health, Counter-Industry, and Industry ApproachesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Televised State-Sponsored Antitobacco Advertising and Youth Smoking Beliefs and Behavior in the United States, 1999-2000Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2005
- Evidence of a Dose—Response Relationship Between “truth” Antismoking Ads and Youth Smoking PrevalenceAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Do adult focused anti-smoking campaigns have an impact on adolescents? The case of the Australian National Tobacco CampaignTobacco Control, 2003