Factors That Influence the Clinical Decision Making of Physical Therapists in Choosing a Balance Assessment Approach
Open Access
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
- Vol. 89 (3), 233-247
- https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080131
Abstract
BackgroundMany methods for examining patients with balance deficits are supported by the literature. How or why therapists choose specific balance assessment methods during examination of patients remains unclear.ObjectivesThe aims of this study were: (1) to explore decision making during examination of patients with balance deficits, (2) to understand the selection and use of assessment methods from the clinician's perspective, and (3) to explore why specific methods were selected.DesignA qualitative design using a grounded theory approach permitted exploration of clinical decision making.MethodsEleven therapists were purposefully selected (6 from outpatient offices, 5 from inpatient rehabilitation settings) to participate in repeated interviews. Credibility of the findings was established through low-inference data, member check, and triangulation among participants and multiple data sources.ResultsA highly individualized approach to patient examination based on therapists’ practical knowledge emerged from the data, with limited influence of the literature. Movement observation was the primary assessment and diagnostic tool. When selecting assessment approaches for specific patients, the perceived value of information gathered mattered more than testing time. A 3-stage model of assessment decision making portrayed both the process and reasons influencing therapists’ choices.ConclusionsIn the context of the complex and busy nature of clinical practice, therapists gathered data that they considered meaningful during patient examination. The findings provide insight into factors influencing assessment decisions and suggest mechanisms to foster translation of research into clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making Geriatric Assessment Work: Selecting Useful MeasuresPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2001
- Reliability of Measurements Obtained With the Timed “Up & Go” Test in People With Parkinson DiseasePTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2001
- Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go TestPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2000
- A Prospective Study of Laboratory and Clinical Measures of Postural Stability to Predict Community-Dwelling FallersThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2000
- Clinical ReasoningNeurology Report, 1999
- A Review of Balance Instruments for Older AdultsAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1998
- Clinical Balance MeasuresNeurology Report, 1997
- Functional Reach: Predictive Validity in a Sample of Elderly Male VeteransJournal of Gerontology, 1992
- Standards for Tests and Measurements in Physical Therapy PracticePTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1991
- The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly PersonsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991